By Sharon Begley                
NEW YORK, Dec 13 (Reuters) - The cancer cells were not  behaving the way the textbooks say they should. Some of the  cells in colonies that were started with colorectal tumor cells  were propagating like mad; others were hardly multiplying. Some  were dropping dead from chemotherapy and others were no more  slowed by the drug than is a tsunami by a tissue. Yet the cells  in each "clone" all had identical genomes, supposedly the  all-powerful determinant of how cancer cells behave.                
That finding, published online Thursday in Science, could  explain why almost none of the new generation of "personalized"  cancer drugs is a true cure, and suggests that drugs based on  genetics alone will never achieve that holy grail.                
Scientists not involved in the study praised it for  correcting what Dr. Charis Eng, an oncologist and geneticist who  leads the Genomic Medicine Institute at the Cleveland Clinic,  called "the simple-minded" idea that tumor genomes alone explain  cancer.                
Calling the study "very exciting," she said the finding  underlines that a tumor's behavior and, most important, its  Achilles heel depend on something other than its DNA. Her own  work, for instance, has shown that patients with identical  mutations can have different cancers.                
The core premise of the leading model of cancer therapy is  that cells become malignant when they develop mutations that  make them proliferate uncontrolled. Find a molecule that targets  the "driver" mutation, and a pharmaceutical company will have a  winner and patients will be cancer-free.                
That's the basis for "molecularly targeted" drugs such as  Pfizer 's Xalkori for some lung cancers and  Novartis 's Gleevec for chronic myeloid leukemia. When  those drugs stop working, the dogma says, it is because cells  have developed new cancer-causing mutations that the drugs don't  target.                
In the new study, however, scientists found that despite  having identical genetic mutations, colorectal cancer cells  behaved as differently as if they were genetic strangers. The  findings challenge the prevailing view that genes determine how  individual cells in a solid tumor behave, including how they  respond to chemotherapy and how actively they propagate.                
If DNA is not the sole driver of tumors' behavior, said  molecular geneticist John Dick of the Princess Margaret Cancer  Centre in Toronto, who led the study, it suggests that, to  vanquish a cancer entirely, drugs will have to target their  non-genetic traits too, something few drug-discovery teams are  doing.                
Genomes are what cutting-edge clinics test for when they try  to match a patient's tumor to the therapy most likely to squelch  it.                
For their study, Antonija Kreso, Catherine O'Brien and other  scientists under Dick's direction took colorectal cancer cells  from 10 patients and transplanted them into mice. They infected  the cells with a special virus that let them track each cell,  even after it divided and multiplied and was transplanted into  another mouse, then another and another, through as many as five  such "passages."                
Only one in 10,000 tumor cells was responsible for keeping  the cancer growing, the scientists found - in some cases for 500  days of repeated transplantation from one mouse to the next.  Genetically-identical tumor cells stopped dividing within 100  days even without treatment.                
Tumor cells that were not killed by chemotherapy - the  scientists used oxaliplatin, a colon-cancer drug sold by  Sanofi as Eloxatin - had the same mutations as cells  that were. The survivors tended to be dormant, non-proliferating  ones that suddenly became activated, causing the tumor to grow  again. Yet the cells - dormant or active, invulnerable to chemo  or susceptible - had identical genomes.                
"I thought we'd be able to look at the genetics that let  some cells propagate, or not be susceptible to chemotherapy, but  lo and behold there was no genetic difference," said Dick. "That  goes against a main dogma of the cancer enterprise: that if a  tumor comes back after treatment it's because some cells  acquired mutations that made them resistant."                
That's true in some cases, he said, "but what our data are  saying is, there are other biological properties that matter.  Gene sequencing of tumors is definitely not the whole story when  it comes to identifying which therapies will work."                
The results were surprising enough, Dick said, that experts  reviewing the paper for Science asked him to run additional  tests to make sure the cells that behaved so differently were in  fact genetic twins. He did, they were, and Science accepted the  paper.                
Other experts also praised the work, saying it supported the  growing suspicion in the field that personalized cancer therapy  is oversimplistic, at least in how it's sold to the public.                
"It's not as simple as just sequencing mutations to tailor  therapies to each tumor," said surgical oncologist Dr. Steven  Libutti of the Montefiore Einstein Center for Cancer Care in New  York City. "In my mind, the findings are not unexpected. Other  things besides genes matter: the environment in which a tumor is  growing, for instance, plays an important role in whether  therapy will be effective."                
Rather than targeting DNA alone, the Toronto scientists  suspect, effective therapies would also take aim at what phase  of its cycle a cell is in (dormant, growing or dividing, for  example), which of its genes are activated, whether it sits in a  region of the tumor that is starved of oxygen, and other  non-genetic properties.                
Nudging tumor cells out of their dormant phase and into  their growth cycles, for instance, could make them more  susceptible to chemotherapy, which generally targets rapidly  dividing cells.                
"Our findings raise questions about the resources put into  sequence, sequence, sequence," said Dick. "That has led to one  kind of therapeutic" - molecularly-targeted drugs - "but not the  cures the public is being promised."
Also on HuffPost:
"; var coords = [-5, -72]; // display fb-bubble FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, 'top', {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: 'clear-overlay'}); });
Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/14/personalized-cancer-medicine-cure-drugs_n_2294867.html
apple stock pilar sanders andrew young real life barbie zipper armenian genocide asteroid mining
 
কোন মন্তব্য নেই:
একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন